[Redbook1:189-190][19701202.0000]{Duty
and Responsibility}[2nd December 1970]
Wed. 2nd December 1970.
I may have
said before that I believe that people should not be held to account for the
actions of their governments -- even in democracies.
I think
this is a terribly important point. Two
things seem to follow from it.
First, war
is wrong on this count as well: nearly always it is the government that makes
the war and the people that cops it.
Secondly,
it might seem that this excuses citizens from feeling a duty to influence their
governments in some direction. Of course
it doesn't, by this analogy: if I am walking down the street and I see a father
attacking his child with obviously murderous intent, I do not walk on – even
though they are not of my family and in that sense it has nothing to do with
me. I shall try to save the child
through some deeply-felt obligation to humanity in general. Had I not done so I should have felt in part
responsible for the child’s suffering. The
fact that the father is no relation of mine is irrelevant: I happened to be
there. The fact that I am not
accountable for the actions of my government is irrelevant: I live here, and
they are my government, so I may consider myself to have a duty to try and
influence them. No one else may hold me
to blame for the government's actions.
This is not
to be confused with resistance to one’s own government in time of national
defence, which is a degree of development away from nature (?) that we cannot yet afford. Treachery towards one's own race or species
must always seem among the greater crimes.
[PostedBlogger31052013]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.