{Inner Doubling [continued]}[24th April 1991]

[Redbook9:186][19910424:0902c]{Inner Doubling [continued]}[24th April 1991]

19910424:0902

[continued]

There at least two possible explanations of this,* one or both of which may be involved.

(1) That the sequence C → M~ → G~ → A~ actually represents the correct or most effective way of approach to the discovery of the C[ircles] A[nalysis] & S[ynthesis] pattern itself;

(2) That the first experience, as a child, of the inner presence of C initially identifies** the self, in this newly multiplying sequence, as A~; M~ and G~ follow next, but (at the same time as G~ (in the earlier ‘The Gift’) A~ itself becomes separately identifiable[,] as the Self (at least by the time of the [0] version) tends strongly toward C.

Interesting stuff.

*[See last previous ts journal entry]

**(identifies!)

[PostedBlogger23012025]