{Byzantine Cycle?}[20th February 1991]

[Redbook8:273][19910220:2345]{Byzantine Cycle?}[20th February 1991]

.2345

What’s interesting, at first glance, is that there seems to be little clear pattern in the second 2048 year cycle quarter, 512-1024CE, for the Byzantine Empire, but something more like one in the third, 1024-1536CE. This is pretty much what I found for Britain over the same periods, although the British pattern for the second period is far clearer. My secondary source for Britain in that second period is, of course, far more detailed than for the Byzantine Empire, and perhaps this has something to do with it.

I also wonder whether the average length of human life at that time is related to the shortest observable historical period length.

* ref [[Redbook8:44-67][19901027ff]{Comparative Chronology}[27th October 1990]] 62

**(if anything, a reversed cycle – ref iconoclasm? Are the image-makers G~, or the image-breakers?)<910221>

***ref [[Redbook8:44-67][19901027ff]{Comparative Chronology}[27th October 1990]] 64

****ref [[Redbook8:80-82][19901031:1540b]{Anglo-Saxon Cycles}[31st October 1990],] 80, &c

#{I suggest a c[irca]1024 year cycle for Byzantium, c[irca]512-1536CE, bearing in mind actual breaking of links with Rome (say 476[CE], when the Huns deposed the last Western [Roman] Emperor), and the Muslim conquest (1453); but affected by the 2048 year cycle [1-2048CE].

cf Islam (ref Vol IX []}

[PostedBlogger01092023]