{Student Teacher [continued (4)]}[5th January 1988]

[Redbook4:292-293][19880105:1222d]{Student Teacher [continued (4)]}[5th January 1988]

19880105.1252

[continued]

All in all it* was a rewarding experience. One thing it does suggest is the importance of pitching each approach to the kind of person addressed: the system is probably sufficiently complex to make this relatively easy. With a little shift of emphasis, the booklets I had planned could probably be pitched in this way without sacrificing their sector- or subject-based approach. The actual subject emphasised for each booklet might, however, be different from that planned; and the diagonals might feature as well (actually there may be no end to this).**

I think that the major differences*** would be between G~ and M~: the former booklet ('Learning Curves') being about politics as well as education (the two go together nowadays):*** most political action is to bring about revolutionary change. The cycle and decay of civilisations etc. would probably come here now. The M~ booklet (formerly 'Cycles of Civilisation' or somesuch)**** would probably deal with Administration, Utopias etc.

	/←	I Personal Circles	→\
		|
	\	V Circles of the Spirit	/ ←\
II Learning Curves	↑─↓	☼	↑─↓	IV Action Cycles
(or III?)	/		\
		\→/ | \←/
		III (or II?) Wheels of Fortune

+ Circles Analysis.

[In the ms diagram the arrows curve around the (invisible) Circles; this is represented here by arrows with slashes.]

The question is, to what extent the two Circles (or directions) can be tied together? For I(PC), III(WoF), and V(CotS) I do not foresee a problem: all these are fairly comprehensive. The difficulty arises with II(LC) and IV(AC)#. Possibly I ought to number them in the order in which I expect to produce them: i.e. Personal Circles [PC], Wheels of Fortune [WoF], Learning Curves[LC] and Cycles of the Spirit [CotS]

*[See last three previous entries, from [Redbook4:290-293][19880105:1222]{Student Teacher}[5th January 1988].]

**cf. [[Redbook4:48-49][19870730:0010]{“Speak!”}[30^th July 1987],] 48

***[In SX's changed model, presumably.*]

****[cf. [Redbook4:233][19871215:2232e]{Booklets?}[15th December 1987] ]

#[Action Cycles]

[PostedBlogger04092017]