[Redbook4:188-189][19871130:0920]{The
Weight of Sin (2) [continued]
– Sexual Intercourse and Love}[30th
November 1987]
19871130.0920
*And yet, and yet... there is
something missing from this* analysis, at least as far as sexual
behaviour is concerned: it gives me the uneasy feeling of having been
distorted to fit the prejudices. I think the missing link is Love,
the motivation of the Transformation from Selfishness to Selflessness
(cf. [TXIV] Temperance). **If instead of Love there follows
Attraction, no Transformation will occur – this time round.
Selflessness is a litmus test of true Love. The question – 'Am I
prepared to procreate with this person?' – may well be an indicator
of Love and Selflessness in this context (although not always –
people {may} have children for selfish reasons, I think).
But applying Circles Analysis
strictly to the problem (instead of, as yesterday,**** applying old
tests) does not suggest quite the same solution. It suggests to me
now that sexual intercourse is by its nature an Outer Circle and
therefore soul-staining# process which can, however, acquire an Inner
Circle clarity by the transforming power of Love.
*[See
last previous entry, & [[Redbook4:180][19871129:2107d]{The
Weight of Sin (1)}[29th
November 1987],ff].
**WRONG!
cf. XVI:60ff: Attraction is in one sense neutral; the cycle can turn
either way, through Love, or by Ordination (Will). <930511>
***ref.
{[[Redbook4:185-186][19871129:2107o]{The Weight of Sin (1) [continued
(13)]
– Sexual Selflessness]}[29th
November 1987],] 186}
****[[Redbook4:180][19871129:2107d]{The
Weight of Sin (1)}[29th
November 1987],ff]
#i.e.
'Sinful'
No;
this is to confuse the material (or physical) with the wrong. Like
any other activity, sexual intercourse is morally neutral <930511>
[See
[Redbook4:190][19871130:0920e]{The Weight of Sin (2) [continued (6)]
– Homosexuality: Summary}[30th November 1987], fn
ult. <20170403>]
[continues]
[PostedBlogger02for04042017]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.