{The Weight of Sin (2) [continued (5)] – Immaturity}[30th November 1987]

[Redbook4:190][19871130:0920d]{The Weight of Sin (2) [continued (5)] – Immaturity}[30th November 1987]

19871130.0920

[continued]

I think this* also identifies another aspect of homosexuality: that it generally masks a static position at an immature station, e.g. boyhood (4 - 8/9)** or early manhood (21/22 – 25/27)** for which genital homosexuality is not particularly appropriate. By the time the Inner Circle phases come round – 42/44 – 46/49**, and 59/63 – 63/66** – genital homosexuality is even less apposite: in the final case, Kings Uriel (sounds like a Hampshire village***), I should guess that genital sexuality in general should be receding in importance.

*[See last previous entry.]

**[See last previous entry but one.]

***[Or a mediaeval STD. <20170406>]

[This paragraph, like so much of what has preceded it on the subject of what appears in fact to be male homosexuality, seems now to be misconceived in so many ways. & See next entry. <201701-03c>]

[continues]

[PostedBlogger07042017]