[Redbook2:148][19790423:2150]{Reactionary}[23rd April 1979]
19790423.2150
It's
funny how people's opinions still matter. S tells me that TC, apart
from talking freely about my [unit]
(he was my referee for positive vetting, and the interviewer crassly
told him before I had), stated that I was always a bit of a
reactionary. However meaningless these labels seem, at least in his
sense, they still have influence – and his attitude is particularly
irritating because the last the last time I tried to get him to talk
Utopian politics he explained that he simply was not interested in
politic any more – he had no time – or at least, that was what I
understood him to say. Perhaps he had decided already that, being
reactionary, I was not worth talking to politically! So far as I know
his only clues to my political beliefs are my [unit],
and the short-lived idea of the '[…] Movement' at Cambridge. The
only difference in our approach to the latter was that he said he
would stay out until he could see what emerged, whereas I stayed in
until I could see what was emerging – that is, a fundamental clash
between my devolutionary utopianism and CB's superficially fascist
centralism.
*
[PostedBlogger18112014]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.