[Redbook9:54-55][19910409:0923g]{(1) Michel Foucault (2) Moralizing and Administration [continued]}[9th April 1991]
19910409.0923
[continued]
*‘The death of Victorian England signified, among other things, the transference of responsibility from the individual to the state.’
**
The previous extracted article** is in[this journal] for two reasons: the reaction*** against Michel Focault in the first three paragraphs,** which brings out the ultimate dissolution characteristic of R~ in its most extreme form, as manifest in this kind of theory; and the rest of the article, whose ideas are more difficult to analyse in C[ircles] A[nalysis] and S[ynthesis] terms.
The article implies a three-fold division of the Victorian era, roughly along these lines:
Period System:  | 
		
			  | 
		C[ommon] E[ra]  | 
		C[ircles] A[nalysis] and S[ynthesis] (64 y[ea]rs)  | 
		
			  | 
	
			  | 
		
			  | 
		
			  | 
		(1832J~ )  | 
		(2048R~1792)  | 
	
1st theory/  | 
		
			  | 
		1837  | 
		1840G~  | 
		
			  | 
	
period:  | 
		Early Victorian  | 
		
			  | 
		1848R~  | 
		
			  | 
	
‘Disciplinary  | 
		
			  | 
		1856  | 
		1856C  | 
		
			  | 
	
Moralisation’  | 
		Mid Victorian  | 
		
			  | 
		1864S~(-r~)  | 
		
			  | 
	
(↓)****  | 
		
			  | 
		1875  | 
		1872M~  | 
		
			  | 
	
			  | 
		----------------------  | 
		
			  | 
		1880U~  | 
		
			  | 
	
2nd theory/  | 
		Late Victorian  | 
		
			  | 
		1888A~  | 
		
			  | 
	
Period:  | 
		
			  | 
		1901  | 
		1896J~  | 
		
			  | 
	
‘Welfarist  | 
		+ Edwardian  | 
		
			  | 
		1904G~  | 
		
			  | 
	
Administration’  | 
		
			  | 
		1910  | 
		1912R~  | 
		
			  | 
	
			  | 
		
			  | 
		
			  | 
		1920C  | 
		(2048R~C~)  | 
	
It is difficult to reconcile this in any straightforward way with the major C[ircles] A[nalysis] and S[ynthesis] cycles. The reviewer seems to feel that the ‘moralisation’ continued into late Victorian times, overlapping with administrative solutions: this makes a great deal more sense. So does the transfer or responsibility from the individual to the State, in the 2048-[&-]64-year# context around 1900.#*
*[See fn=# below]
**[ibid (per last previous ts entry): ‘Suitable cases for treatment[:] Moral attitudes to crime and punishment in Victorian England’, by Gertrude Himmelfarb, Times Literary Supplement 15/03/1991:7]
***[& in 1991 (per fn=** above); 64S~1992....]
****[Dashed/dotted arrow in ms]
#[sic; ‘-year &’ is deleted in ms, but probably the ‘&’ should have remained.]
#*↑[See text above marked]*
[PostedBlogger03for05052024]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.