[Redbook9:54-55][19910409:0923g]{(1) Michel Foucault (2) Moralizing and Administration [continued]}[9th April 1991]
19910409.0923
[continued]
*‘The death of Victorian England signified, among other things, the transference of responsibility from the individual to the state.’
**
The previous extracted article** is in[this journal] for two reasons: the reaction*** against Michel Focault in the first three paragraphs,** which brings out the ultimate dissolution characteristic of R~ in its most extreme form, as manifest in this kind of theory; and the rest of the article, whose ideas are more difficult to analyse in C[ircles] A[nalysis] and S[ynthesis] terms.
The article implies a three-fold division of the Victorian era, roughly along these lines:
Period System: |
|
C[ommon] E[ra] |
C[ircles] A[nalysis] and S[ynthesis] (64 y[ea]rs) |
|
|
|
|
(1832J~ ) |
(2048R~1792) |
1st theory/ |
|
1837 |
1840G~ |
|
period: |
Early Victorian |
|
1848R~ |
|
‘Disciplinary |
|
1856 |
1856C |
|
Moralisation’ |
Mid Victorian |
|
1864S~(-r~) |
|
(↓)**** |
|
1875 |
1872M~ |
|
|
---------------------- |
|
1880U~ |
|
2nd theory/ |
Late Victorian |
|
1888A~ |
|
Period: |
|
1901 |
1896J~ |
|
‘Welfarist |
+ Edwardian |
|
1904G~ |
|
Administration’ |
|
1910 |
1912R~ |
|
|
|
|
1920C |
(2048R~C~) |
It is difficult to reconcile this in any straightforward way with the major C[ircles] A[nalysis] and S[ynthesis] cycles. The reviewer seems to feel that the ‘moralisation’ continued into late Victorian times, overlapping with administrative solutions: this makes a great deal more sense. So does the transfer or responsibility from the individual to the State, in the 2048-[&-]64-year# context around 1900.#*
*[See fn=# below]
**[ibid (per last previous ts entry): ‘Suitable cases for treatment[:] Moral attitudes to crime and punishment in Victorian England’, by Gertrude Himmelfarb, Times Literary Supplement 15/03/1991:7]
***[& in 1991 (per fn=** above); 64S~1992....]
****[Dashed/dotted arrow in ms]
#[sic; ‘-year &’ is deleted in ms, but probably the ‘&’ should have remained.]
#*↑[See text above marked]*
[PostedBlogger03for05052024]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.