{Fundamental Forces [continued(16)]:The Complexity Table}[23rd October 1979]

[Redbook2:159P][19791023:1335]{Fundamental Forces [continued(16)]:The Complexity Table}[23rd October 1979]

19791023.1335

The implications of all this for the [4] are alarming – particularly for +C and +Mk (+M and +K, being less fundamental, may be treated more flexibly). The ambiguity has always been there: it is natural to see +C as Light and Life, +Mk as Darkness and Death, but it has always been clear that the complexity of their relationships is such as, in one sense, to reverse their positions: +Mk gives rise to physical life, through essential physical death, whereas the absolute nature of +C is only ultimately attained through physical death and release of the Spirit. Now these ambiguities – so clear throughout all interpretations of religious philosophy, etc. – are reinforced by these interpretations of modern physics. Is Man's interpretation of his own instincts confused by his viewpoint? The ambiguities may in fact lend strength to the interpretations and to my narrative.

[continues]

[PostedBlogger11122014]