{Star Cycles (I) – Colours}[19th November 1987]

[Redbook4:155][19871119:2312e]{Star Cycles (I) – Colours}[19^th November 1987]

19871119:2312

[continued]

But* I have in the past considered the Circle relationships to wavelengths, based on colours; e.g.:**

			Green
		Yellow	WHITE	Light Blue
	(Orange)
Red			[+]			Blue
		Purple		Mauve
		(Infra-red)		(Ultra-violet)
			(Black)

If*** the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram main sequence plotting colour and temperature (identically, as spectral type) against luminosity correctly identifies the normal life of a hydrogen-fusing star (OBAFGKM), it can be plotted on the circle very precisely[:]

				(I~)
				←
***(Our Sun)			F		A
			G***	│	B
		↓K		│		O↑
(G~)		↓M	────	+	────			(M~)
				│
				│
				[A~]

[In the ms diagram the arrows continuously curve anticlockwise round the upper semicircle.]

***

*[Ref last previous entry(/entries?), presumably.]

**(ref.: Chartrand: Amateur Astronomy Pocket Skyguide (Newnes) pp48-51.)

***{This is all misunderstood: see [[Redbook4:163][19871121:1310b]{Star Cycles (III) – The Main Sequence}[21st November 1987],] p163.}

[continues]

[PostedBlogger24for25012017]

{Barometers}[19th November 1987]

[Redbook4:154-155][19871119:2312d]{Barometers}[19^th November 1987]

19871119:2312

[continued]

● I was, however*, delighted to see (on a barometer catalogue) that barometers generally seem to share the same layout**, with all or some (or none [sic]) of the words occurring in the same places (i.e. the underlying numbers are always in the same places):

			(I~)
	(29)		Change		(30)
		RAIN		FAIR
(G~)	Much Rain		+		Set Fair	(M~)
		STORMY		VERY DRY
	(28)				(31)
{LOW [PRESSURE]}						{HIGH PRESSURE}

Compare the 4 'elements' {(on the Circles):}

			I~
	(Wet)				(Cold)
		WATER		AIR
G~			+			M~
		FIRE		EARTH
	(Hot)				(Dry)

Delightful! Perhaps I recalled the barometer that hung at [C]....

*[ref. last 3 previous entries, presumably; this is the last of three bullet-pointed “Points Arising” referred to in [Redbook4:153][19871119:2312]{Methodology: Points Arising}[19^th November 1987].]

**[with each other, presumably.]

See [[Redbook4:160][19871119:2312#]{Star Cycles II – Circle Polarity}[19^th November 1987],] p160.

[PostedBlogger24012017]

{Computer Characterisation}[19th November 1987]

[Redbook4:153-154][19871119:2312c]{Computer Characterisation}[19^th November 1987]

19871119:2312

[continued]

● Years ago (this is a new point)*, when I was first interested in microcomputers** and their games, I hypothesised a method of programming for variations in game-character behaviour consistent with character based on the circles structure of eight-spoked 'wheels' (8 being a useful number in low-level programming). I lacked the knowledge or ability to to take this further, and did not consider it for many years (as far as I know) until very recently: when it occurred to me that the attributions of Vices, Virtues and Gifts to the Circles, if they are valid attributes, might form the human basis for exactly such a system.*** However, I do not think I have the interest to take this further into the computer world at this stage.

*[Ref. Last previous entry.]

**[Sinclair ZX81 acquired c.1981, Sinclair Spectrum acquired c.1982, Victor Sirius acquired 1982; but the interest was longer-standing, going back at least as far as the Commodore Pet in about 1977.]

***[Or A.I. or even 'consciousness'/self-consciousness? cf. the occurrence or relative unpredictability on the Outer Circle around xP/J~ <20161218>]

[PostedBlogger23012017]

{Superstring Theory and Circles Analysis}[19th November 1987]

[Redbook4:153][19871119:2312b]{Superstring Theory and Circles Analysis}[19^th November 1987]

19871119:2312

[continued]

● I do not want the previous entry* to be misunderstood. I do not think that Superstring Theory is Circles Analysis, so that (for example) the circle of Virtues might be a Dimension. I merely perceive interesting similarities.

*[In this typescript, the last four previous entries but one, from [Redbook4:149-152][19871021:1425]{Superstrings and Fundamental Forces}[21st October 1987].]

[PostedBlogger22012017]

{Methodology: Points Arising}[19th November 1987]

[Redbook4:153][19871119:2312]{Methodology: Points Arising}[19^th November 1987]

19871119:2312

The points have been piling up, with general listlessness possibly a result. I think I originally left these entries*{,} prompted by the usual feeling of stretch or staleness suggesting over-indulgence or forcing; and to clear my mind. I have put off re-entry** out of a slight disinclination to submerge myself again when there are so many more superficially enjoyable things to do: like spending small sums of money, and making small improvements to [CH]. But I had no idea that I had stayed away a whole month. I do not think such an absence is a good idea: I fear that I have lost much, and know that I have lost much freshness of ideas even if I have gained, possibly, in freshness of mind.***

Points arising:****

*[i.e. the piled-up points, presumably, resulting in the next 3(+?) entries.]

**A significant development?! Ever since I wrote [2], this sort of writing has made my right shoulder sore afterwards [i.e it has been intensely driven].

***Sniff!

****[See next 3 entries, which are bullet-pointed as in the ms.]

[PostedBlogger21012017]

{Superstrings and Fundamental Forces [continued (4)]}[21st October 1987]

[Redbook4:152][19871021:1425d]{Superstrings and Fundamental Forces [continued (4)]}[21st October 1987]

19871021:1425

[continued]

Superstring Theory – significant co-incidences[:]

	Quantum and Superstring Theory	Circles Analysis
(1)	Quantum Theory
	Angular Momentum / Spin:
(a)	Graviton = 2	[Dual concentric circles in ms] 2 Universes?
(b)	Other Bosons (Force Particles) = 1 (Photon, Gluon, Intermediate Boson) (W+, W-, W0)	○ [Single circle in ms]
(c)	Fermions (Matter Particles) = 1/2	[Right semicircle arrowed clockwise in ms (i.e. +C/I~ → +MkA~)]
(2)	Superstring Theory
(a)	Closed loops with energy (=> mass) and spin	○ [Single circle]
(b)	Touch and part	Mingle
	Merge	Fuse
	Divide	(Birth)
(c)	Clockwise (Fermions, Matter)
	4 known dimensions (Length, Height, Depth, Time)	e.g. *Gifts (D?), Virtues (H?), Vices (L?), Outer Principles (T).
	6 hidden or 'curled up' dimensions	e.g. **One, Lights, Wheels, Names, Degrees, Inner Principles.
	10 TOTAL
	Anti-clockwise (Bosons, Forces)	(As above)
	4 known dimensions (Length, Height, Depth, Time)	4 Apparent Quality Circles or Loops (as above*)
	6 hidden or 'curled up' dimensions	6 Hidden Quality Circles or Loops (as above**)
	10 [TOTAL]
16 'curled	8	Inner Circle \ / Reversed directions of rotation
up'	8	Outer Circle / \ cancel each other out.
	26
	When 16 are curled up to give 10, => e.g. E8 x E8 structure.	2 Circles of Square and diagonal cross.
(d)	Shadow Universe	?? Spiritual Realm***
	Sharing only Gravity with our Universe	(Attraction to) Unity affects whole of other Universe?
	but having its own matter	Souls?
	and forces	****e.g. Spirit; Lights (Attraction to Unity)(above); Wheels (Dynamic Independence); Names (Identity); Degrees (Involvement); and Inner Principles.****

***{???}

****{?} [for all text between the two sets of 4 asterisks]

{(See V.200)}

[And now see next entry but one, [Redbook4:153][19871119:2312b]{Superstring Theory and Circles Analysis}[19^th November 1987].]

[PostedBlogger19for20012017]

{Superstrings and Fundamental Forces [continued (3)]}[21st October 1987]

[Redbook4:151][19871021:1425c]{Superstrings and Fundamental Forces [continued (3)]}[21st October 1987]

19871021:1425

[continued]

The 4 Forces: significant co-incidences:

(a) Order of differentiation after the Big Bang:

or, put another way:

[Text of diagrams:]

┌─┴	─────┐
(1) Gravity	│
	┌──┴────	───┐
	(2) Strong Force	│
		┌──┴───────────────	────┐
		│	(3){/(4) }* Weak Force
		│
		(4){/(3)}* Electromagnetic Force

or, put another way:

		(Weakest)
		{IV}
		GRAVITY
{III}	**{Differentiation}	{(1)} | |	{Strength}**	{I}
(3rd Strongest) WEAK NUCLEAR	(3){/(4) }* _______	______|---------	–--------- {(2)}	STRONG NUCLEAR (Strongest)
(Chiral, or handed force – i.e. not even-handed.		| (4){/(3)}*
(cf. twist of Prophets & Sibyls on the Cumaean side of the Sistine Chapel ceiling.)		ELECTRO-MAGNETISM
		{II}
		(2nd Strongest)

*In fact, of course, the order of differentiation of the last two should (presumably) be interchangeable. <891003>

**{D[iagonal d]ividing lines.}

(b) Order of strength:

{(I)}	Strong Nuclear
{(II)}	Electromagnetic
{(III)}	Weak Nuclear
{(IV)}	Gravity

(c) Only Gravity and Electromagnetism act at long range.

(d) Only Gravity acts upon everything.***

***{ – per E[nyclopaedia] B[ritannica]?}

{NOT W[eak] F[orce]? <871121> {/per Calder?****}

****[Probably Nigel Calder, 'The Violent Universe' (1969); or 'The Key to the Universe' (1977) (cf. [Redbook4:164][19871121:1310d]{Star Cycles (III) [continued (4)] – The Four Forces}[21st November 1987], fn]

{cf. S&C 21-2 [presumably original full-length paper version]}

[continues]

[PostedBlogger19012017]

[Reposted with ms diagrams 05022017]