{Circle Relationships [continued(9)] – Resonance}[20th August 1987]

[Redbook4:63][19870820:1800k]{Circle Relationships [continued(9)] – Resonance}[20^th August 1987]

19870820.18--

[continued]

(4) Resonance is immensely complicated. Basically, it is the influence of Circle Qualities (or Principles) on other Circle Qualities (or Principles) (I think the two words describe the same thing here*). Clearly Contra-rotation provides a dynamic example of this; so, presumably, does Gearing (even Interaction). But within a particular static pair of Circles there are Resonances which may be described as follows:**

*BUT cf. III.'Belief & Knowledge'

[[Redbook3:118-131][19870405:1057](BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE{1})[5th April 1987]ff

& [Redbook3:184-193][19870414:1003](BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE (2))[14th April 1987]ff,

which seem to imply a specific meaning for Qualities (or at least Quality) which is not synonymous with Principles; &:]

but Innocence at Crisis (above) [[Redbook4:57][19870817:1950]{Points from Annotation[: (1) Innocence and Evil]}[17^th August 1987], presumably,

& with it [Redbook4:59][19870820:1800]{Innocence and Truth}[20^th August 1987].

There is a possible inference that the term 'Principles' is applied more appropriately to the Outer Circle,

and the term 'Qualities' more appropriately to the Inner Circle,

although in practice both terms seem to have been applied at different times to both Circles

& to aspects, manifestations or expressions of them other than (& including) Inner (& Outer) Principles:

see [Redbook4:100][19871005:0940e]{Vices, Virtues, Principles and Gifts}[5th October 1987];

this is probably the preferable interpretation of Qualities as against Principles,

i.e. that Principles (which occur at cardinal and diagonal points on both Outer & Inner Circles) are a subset of Qualities.]

**[See next four entries, ff.]

[continues]

[PostedBlogger10092016]