Sunday, 23 October 2022

{Bull Cults [and Meaning in Art]}[26th November 1990]

[Redbook8:120][19901126:1735c]{Bull Cults [and Meaning in Art]}[26th November 1990]


19901126.1735

[continued]


‘An important question is the extent to which the presence of symbols, such as the bucranium (a sculptured ornament representing an ox skull), can be considered as expressions of specific religious ideas, such as a bull cult, and, indeed, how much the decoration was intended to convey meaning at all.’

E[ncyclopaedia] B[ritannica] 21:911 (*)



*[(‘Iraq’) – See source note to extract in last previous entry]



[PostedBlogger23for31102022]


{The Wisdom of the Undine}[26th November 1990]

[Redbook8:120][19901126:1735b]{The Wisdom of the Undine}[26th November 1990]


19901126.1735

[continued]


‘Berosus’* first book dealt with the beginings of the World and with a myth of a composite being, Oannes, half fish, half man, who came ashore in Babylonia at a time when men still lived like wild beasts. Oannes taught them the essentials of civilisation: writing, the arts, law, agriculture, surveying, and architecture.’

E[ncyclopaedia] B[ritannica] 21:908 (‘Iraq’)



*A Babylonian,** born c340bce, writing in Greek, on Cos in the Aegean.


**[Initially misread from the ms as ‘A Baby Ionian’, giving rise to several minutes of puzzled researching]



[PostedBlogger23for30102022]


{Schumpeter’s Kondratieff Cycles}[26th November 1990]

[Redbook8:120][19901126:1735]{Schumpeter’s Kondratieff Cycles}[26th November 1990]


19901126.1735


Yesterday I believe I managed to reconcile the Kondratieff cycles in economics** with the 64-year cycles of political history – through serendipitously coming across references to Schumpeter’s modifications,*** which generally fit much better.****



*{See} ref VI. [[Redbook6:333][19891026:1125c]{Schumpeter K[, Kondratieff, & Juglar] Cycles}[26th October 1989],] 336{3 (amended)}


**{[[Redbook8:115][19901115:2113b]{[Kondratieff ‘top’ lags]}[15th November 1990],] 115}


***(& [Eric] Hobsbawm’s version [probably in ‘Industry & Empire’])


****{See Booklet 10-3

&/or VI. [[Redbook6:331-332][19891025:0931g]{Economic Cycles [continued (6)]}[25th October 1989]&/or2f,] 332 (amended),

for details}



[PostedBlogger23for29102022]


[Gotterdammerung][25th November 1990]

[Redbook8:119][19901125:1430][Gotterdammerung][25th November 1990]


19901125.1430


(Watched Wagner ‘Gotterdammerung’ Act I, BBC2TV 901124.1930)*



*[See [Redbook8:115][19901117:2216]{Divine Giddiness}*[17th November 1990]. This entry included only for consistency]

[→ [Redbook8:122][19901208:1843b][Gotterdammerung [continued]][8th December 1990]]




[PostedBlogger23for28102022]


{Crisis Resolving?}[22nd November 1990]

[Redbook8:119][1990[1]122:1039]{Crisis Resolving?}[22nd November 1990]


.2310


The news that Mrs Thatcher* is not to stand for re-election as leader is like the lifting of a great burden from one’s outlook on the World. The Sun shines, the air is crisp and clear, the blood runs warmer and more strongly in the arteries; anything, and everything, is possible.


Personally, I hope that Michael Heseltine now loses the contest,** because he is his Party’s best chance of re-election, and we need a change of government.


But I can afford myself a little pat on the back for intuitive foresight – I identified Michael Heseltine as a strong contender back in 1983. There again, for all I know I may have picked this off someone else.



*[Margaret Thatcher, United Kingdom Prime Minister 1979-1990]


**[He did]

{I heard this [about the candidates] [on the radio]in a Carmarthen shop on the last day of the leadership elections:

Douglas Hurd could be your grandad

That John Major*** looks a nice lad

But we are the Hesleteenies....’}

[Based on the Ovalteenies song from the Radio Luxembourg show sponsored by Ovaltine from the 1930s]


***[He won]


***ref II. [[Redbook2:268-270][19830510:2030c]{Malvinas}[10th May 1983]ff,] 268,

[[­& esp][Redbook2:268-270][19830510:2030f]{Malvinas [continued (4)]}[10th May 1983],] 270,;

[[Redbook2:285-287][19830612:1230]{Circles of History}[12th June 1983]ff, &esp [Redbook2:286-287][19830612:1230b]{Circles of History [continued]}[12th June 1983],] 286.



[PostedBlogger23for27102022]


{Precise Crises}[18th November 1990]

[Redbook8:118-119][19901118:2310]{Precise Crises}[18th November 1990]


.2310


Does the idea of a stronger unifying tendency* as one nears C contradict the notion of less ‘oscillation’, and less irregularity, around C?


Not really: one is basically qualitative, in this context, the other quantitative, although the distinctions are not always clear. In fact, less irregularity nearer unity makes some sense.


(It seems obvious now: it didn’t when I first thought about it.)



*[See last previous entry, 2nd para, & entry before last, [Redbook8:116-118][19901118:2032]{Trans-sexual Dressing}[18th November 1990], para ult]


**{cf [[Redbook8:113][19901113:1520]{Ever Decreasing Crises}[13th November 1990],] 113 (footnote)}



[PostedBlogger23for26102022]


{Trans-sexual Dressing [continued (3)]}[18th November 1990]

[Redbook8:118][19901118:2032c]{Trans-sexual Dressing [continued (3)]}[18th November 1990]


19901118.2032

[continued]


What about* the immediate future?


In the 1960’s: ‘Borrowing freely from the opposite sex, unisex fashions came into vogue by the end of the 1960’s. Women often adopted such masculine attire as military surplus and work clothes and the stylish male has long hair, wore “mod” suits, carried a pocketbook, wore jewel[le]ry, and used a wide variety of cosmetics. By the 1980’s, however, there was a return to traditional elegance and classical styling.’*** 1984 is 64C.

****

The phrasing of this E[ncyclopaedia] B[ritannica] piece suggests the unifying tendency# more strongly than I had seen it. I suppose if you read a relative lack of masculine assertion in the 1960’s (compared to the 1890’s/1900’s), we might get away with a similar lack of m[asculine] a[ssertion] in the 1990’s (compared to the 1920’s/1930’s) – whether or not this is due to increasing contra-rotation and the unifying influence of 2048C. I hope we shall, anyway.



*[See last two previous entries]


**ref [entry before last, [Redbook8:116-118][19901118:2032]{Trans-sexual Dressing}[18th November 1990],] 117


***(my emphasis)


**** – E[ncyclopaedia] B[ritannica] 17:461


#[See entry before last, [Redbook8:116-118][19901118:2032]{Trans-sexual Dressing}[18th November 1990], para ult]




[PostedBlogger23for25102022]


{Trans-sexual Dressing [continued]}[18th November 1990]

[Redbook8:117][19901118:2032b]{Trans-sexual Dressing [continued]}[18th November 1990]


19901118.2032

[continued]


What of other* periods?


64J~1896 – 64G~1904 {–} 64R~1912: I tend to associate Beardsley and Wilde with this period, although both died relatively early;** both {conveying} a distinctly un-’masculine’ languidness of style in image of self or others, which does not necessarily go with the Aestheticism of which they might appear to be a late stage. I note that Beardsley enjoyed a notable revival in the 1960’s.***


Wilde was homosexual, Beardsley was **** not; if G~ implies male homosexuality, my earlier ideas linking male homosexuality and collegiate-ness around S~ are wrong.# The Gay#* movement certainly flourished from the late sixties/early seventies onward, along with feminism.


Men’s wigs came into fashion (in modern Europe) (after Louis XIII [of France]) in 1624, and lasted until the French and American Revolutions as a symbol of social status. This period of 128 years (64x2) is immediately before R~ on the 2048 year cycle; many men of the Civil War#*** period in England, of course, wore their hair long (popularly the ‘Cavaliers’ against the cropped Puritan ‘Roundheads’, although the division may not have been so clear-cut). I do not have any more information on hair lengths.



*[See last previous entry]


**[Aubrey Beardsley 1872-1898; Oscar Wilde 1854-1900]


***E[ncyclopaedia] B[ritannica] 2:13

[I remember it]


****[probably]


#ref (earlier Vol) IV? [?[Redbook4:189][19871130:0920b]{The Weight of Sin (2) [continued (3)] – Male and Female Influences*}[30th November 1987]?] – near end?

{There are different types of homosexuality: for example, in male homosexuality, the type that in its maleness fears the female ‘unknown’ and clubs together with other males, in varying states of intensity; and the type that is attracted to males from a female viewpoint albeit in a male body.}

[‘For example’ indicates that these are not suggested as the only types of male homosexuality; but the distinction within what was then considered homosexuality, between what might now be characterised as homosexual on the one hand, and trans-gender on the other, is perhaps interesting]


#*[In the modern, adopted sense of the word which has resulted in the loss of the previous meaning, unique to the word, as in “The Gay [Eighteen-]Nineties’, ‘Gay Paree’ [Paris]]


#**1642-48[ce]



[continued]


[PostedBlogger23for24102022]


{Trans-sexual Dressing}[18th November 1990]

[Redbook8:116-118][19901118:2032]{Trans-sexual Dressing}[18th November 1990]


19901118.2032


A 1920’s-30’s[-set] sitcom, ‘You rang, M’Lord?’, on BBC1 [TV] has two aristocratic sisters of whom one is feminine and the other cross-dresses as a man. This is an enduring image of the inter-war period, at least as strong as that of the ‘Flapper’ – whose physique was de-sexualised, flat chests being the* female ideal. But the ‘Flapper’ image has often struck me as resonant, not so much of maleness in its suppression of the female physique, as of xS (R~).


By contrast the 1960s suggest males dressing towards the female ideal, with long hair and jewel[le]ry – a tendency which has by now almost disappeared; but as against this, trousers for women began to reappear (having presumably vanished at the end of the [2nd World] War at least as early as the late sixties.


With the exception of the last feature, which I cannot explain, these fashion tendencies fit in with the C[ircles] A[nalysis] & S[ynthesis] location C(1920) → r~/S~(1928) – (g~)/M~(1936) for the first period, and J~(1960) – G~(1968) – R~(1976) for the second.


(My only, and tentative, suggestion for the female trousers is that as we approach 2048C, the 64-cycle contra-rotation and/or the unifying tendencies of C become more noticeable. But I cannot support this with other evidence).**



*{/a?}


**(& Contra-rotation is virtually ‘having it both ways’)

(But re Unification, which implies Contra-rotation, see [entry after next, [Redbook8:118][19901118:2032b]{Trans-sexual Dressing [continued (3)]}[18th November 1990]] 118)

[Also perhaps worth considering that trousers are ambiguous as to gender & sexuality – more difficult to get off/into, but potentially much more revealing of female sexuality than skirts or dresses.]



[continued]


[PostedBlogger23102022]

Saturday, 22 October 2022

{Dis-ease and Re-creation}[17th November 1990]

[Redbook8:116][19901117:2216b]{Dis-ease and Re-creation}[17th November 1990]


19901117.2216

[continued]


Disease, illness, apparently linked with C (via the Pale Horseman), does or can bring the appropriate opportunity to stop and reflect,* leading sometimes to a real change of direction.**



*[or just stop]


**[indeed!]



[PostedBlogger22102022]


Wednesday, 19 October 2022

{Divine Giddiness}*[17th November 1990]

[Redbook8:115][19901117:2216]{Divine Giddiness}*[17th November 1990]


19901117.2216


(Watched Wagner, Siegfried, Act III, BBCTV 1935) (finished 2105)**


The waveriness of the *** bracketed entry above was due to my own faintness and dizziness, immediately after an intense invocation to God; following my reading parts of the A[uthorised] V[ersion of the Bible] Christmas Story,**** at her request, to [d]; following my living a fictitious but inspired – in that it went its own way instead of mine – conversation with a nationalist retired clergyman whom [W] keeps being questioned by (re language, number of children etc.) in Llan[...].



*{(cf ‘To play the giddy goat’?)}


**[See [Redbook8:109][19901111:1123][Wagner’s Aliens revisited][11th November 1990]]


***[ms handwriting in the]


****(as beautifully illustrated by Jan Pienkowski)



[→ [Redbook8:119][19901125:1430]{[Gotterdammerung]}[25th November 1990]]




[PostedBlogger19for21102022]


{The Pattern in Action}[15th November 1990]

[Redbook8:115][19901115:2113c]{The Pattern in Action}[15th November 1990]


19901115.2113

[continued]


It’s extraordinary how contemplation of the *pattern in action brings, at the end of a tired [sic] and trying day, instant peace of mind.

**



*[Circles Analysis & Synthesis]


**[So it’s therapy? Or just escape/ism...?]



[PostedBlogger19for20102022]


{[Kondratieff ‘top’ lags]}[15th November 1990]

[Redbook8:115][19901115:2113b]{[Kondratieff ‘top’ lags]}[15th November 1990]


19901115.2113

[continued]


One possible explanation for the delays* in earlier K-cycle ‘tops’ after the regular 64-C year – the ‘top’ in 1873 was M~,** that in 1815 as late as U~*** – is that they may reflect a ‘crisis resolution’ phase as well as (/instead of?) an oscillation sub-cycle.

****

On the other hand, one would expect such a ‘crisis resolution’ phase, which effectively postpones the G~-R~-C~ (Revolution-Simplification-Crisis) symptoms until after C, to be more easily obtained through modern economic control mechanisms; but the delay actually occurs more in the earlier identified K-cycles, in the 19th century.



*ref {VI} [[Redbook6:333][19891026:1125c]{Schumpeter K[, Kondratieff, & Juglar] Cycles}[26th October 1989],] 333 [& [Redbook8:113][19901113:1520]{Ever Decreasing Crises}[13th November 1990]]


**{cf Schumpeter’s K-cycle high point, 1857 (64C1856) instead of 1873}


***{1815 marked the end of the Napoloeonic Wars, which had begun (as the Revolutionary Wars) in 1792 (64C)}


****{(See fact note below)}#


#{ref [[Redbook8:120][19901126:1735]{Schumpeter’s Kondratieff Cycles}[26th November 1990],] 120}

{An answer to this is found in Schumpeter’s variations on the Kondratieff cycle (see [S&C printed] Booklet 10.1-3, & notes above)}


[But ?cf [Redbook8:40][19901020:0835]{The Integrated Cycle}[20th October 1990];

[Redbook8:69][19901027:2310]{Fruitfulness and Decay}**[27th October 1990]]



[PostedBlogger19102022]


Monday, 17 October 2022

{Computer Panic}[15th November 1990]

[Redbook8:114][19901115:2113]{Computer Panic}[15th November 1990]


19901115.2113


Being superstitious about computers – because of the apparent irrationality in failure of these supremely logical machines – we decided not to use our faithful old Sirius (after a lapse of a couple of weeks) on the 13th: this half or more than half in jest, I trust. Just as well! – because when we did start, on the 15th, today, it was at once apparent that the machine had suffered a ‘major systems failure’ probably in the BOOT-ROM area,* about which I could do nothing, and on the most difficult project of the year to do manually. Just imagine how much more superstitious we should have become if we had found this out two days earlier! Tomorrow we take the whole lot to Bridgend for repair, wishing we lived nearer to civilisation.**



*or disk controller board <901117>


**{In the end we decided to buy a new one,*** which arrived with a fault.}


***[An IBM-PC compatible: farewell to CP/M (used with the Victor 9000 / ACT-Sirius 1 since 1982), hello to MS-DOS & eventually Windows]



[PostedBlogger17for18102022]