Thursday, 31 July 2025

{Baroque Sculpture [continued (18)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:303][19910508:0903r]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (18)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]


(France: Baroque and Rococo)


*

**



*[Marginal note:] NB? An expression of the balance of G~ & M~?



** – ibid [Encyclopaedia Britannica 27:] 101

[Source text continues from last previous ts journal entry but one]

[Source text continues in next ts journal entry]



[continued]


[PostedBlogger31072025]


Wednesday, 30 July 2025

{Baroque Sculpture [continued (17)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:303][19910508:0903q]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (17)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]



*

**

***


*[“The Annunciation”, painted wood sculpture by Ignaz Günther, 1764ce; in the Abbey church at Weyarn, Bavaris, Germany.]

{ – ibid: [[Encyclopaedia Britannica 27:]] 103}

[This illustration is from another source]


**{cf [[Redbook9:321][19910511:1000#]{‘The Baroque’ [continued (#)]}[11th May 1991],] 321}


***2048G~1536|R~1792[ce]





[continued]


[PostedBlogger30072025]


Monday, 28 July 2025

{Baroque Sculpture [continued (16)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:302][19910508:0903p]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (16)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]


‘Flanders. In comparison with painting, the sculpture of the 17th century [ce] in the southern provinces is extremely disappointing.

‘… Eighteenth century [ce] painting & sculpture became increasingly weak & provincial, though fantastic pulpits carved by Hendrik Frans Verbruggen, Michel Vervoort, & Theodor Verhaegen provide a remarkable parallel to those in central Europe.’

*



* – ibid [Encyclopaedia Britannica 27:] 101

[Source text continues from last previous ts entry]



[continued]


[PostedBlogger28for29072025]


Baroque Sculpture [continued (15)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:302][19910508:0903o]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (15)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]

‘Gregorio Hernández in sculptures like the “Pietà”* (1617[ce], Museo Nacional de Esculturas, Valladolid, Spain) revealed an emotional realism more Gothic than Baroque (Figure 65)*....

In general the 18th century [ce] saw a sad decline in Spanish sculpture.’

**



*See illustration, ibid;**

this does remind me of those

Nazi & particularly Communist

officially-sponsored arts,

in the emphasis on ‘realism’ and

the idealisation not so much

of its ‘form’, but of its

‘content’ – the ‘idealisation’

or formulaisation [sic] of emotions.{}










{ibid [Encyclopaedia Britannica 27:] 100}


** – ibid [Encyclopaedia Britannica 27:] 101

[Single paragraph in source text]

[Source text & paragraph continue from last previous ts entry]

[Source text continues in next ts entry]




[continued]


[PostedBlogger28072025]


Sunday, 27 July 2025

Baroque Sculpture [continued (14)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:302][19910508:0903n]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (14)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]


‘Spain. Spanish sculpture of the 17th & 18th centuries [ce] exhibits a greater continuity with the late Gothic and the Counter-Reformation than does the painting; and the demands for realism and an emotional stimulus led to sculpture with glass eyes, human hair, & even real fabric costumes. Italian Renaissance sculpture had made a very limited impact in Spain, and with few exceptions this was in court ambience only, while Spanish Baroque sculpture is almost entirely religious and of a fundamentally popular nature.

**



*[See next ts journal entry]


**– ibid [Encyclopaedia Britannica 27:] 101

[Source text & paragraph continue in next ts entry]


[continued]


[PostedBlogger27072025]

Saturday, 26 July 2025

{Baroque Sculpture [continued (13)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:301][19910508:0903m]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (13)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]


And at the same time* of course one has still to follow the turning of the larger cycle – or cycles, although the sheer complexity of the possibilities leads me to restrict my ‘analysis’ to just two main cycles, with only hints of others.



*[See last three previous ts journal entries, [Redbook9:301][19910508:0903j]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (10)]}[8th May 1991]]



[continued]


[PostedBlogger26072025]


Friday, 25 July 2025

{Baroque Sculpture [continued (12)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:301][19910508:0903l]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (12)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]


Then again, life being what it is, it's probably all three of these,* and more....

I expect a lot of this to become much clearer when I reach ‘modern’ art, i.e. c. late 19th century [ce] onwards.**



*[See last two previous ts journal entries, [Redbook9:301][19910508:0903j]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (10)]}[8th May 1991]]


**{Yes. See eg X:[] 3,

[] 63}



[continued]


[PostedBlogger25072025]


Tuesday, 22 July 2025

{Baroque Sculpture [continued (11)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:301][19910508:0903k]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (11)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]


Otherwise,* the only explanation for the overrun of ‘dissolute’** or diffuse expressions of art beyond C at the same time as more 'classical' forms (as well as doctrinal commissions) appear may be e.g.


(a) the habit of clinging to established customs – which as the later stages of an artistic cycle might be expected to be superficial anyway, would not be easily distinguishable from these late stages; or


(b) just possibly, the influence of a complete turn-around at C back towards r~, manifesting itself in that total letting-go, self-sacrifice, abnegation of the self-will (even in design), in short, Surrender, which is not (as in the case of the Outer Circle) the end but the beginning of a new turn of *** cycle, the inner circle, of integration.****

#



*[See last previous ts journal entry]


**ref [[Redbook9:300][19910508:0903g]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (7)]}[8th May 1991],] 300


***[sic – ‘the’?]


****At this stage there is an acute danger of so much ‘spread’ that the whole analysis collapses into chaos (as an o[uter] c[ircle] would....)


#[& see next ts journal entry]



[continued]


[PostedBlogger22for24072025]


{Baroque Sculpture [continued (10)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:301][19910508:0903j]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (10)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]


I suppose that when considering a 64-year cycle one has to expect rather more chronological over-run* than in longer cycles – especially in sculpture, where commission to completion may be a matter of years for a complex (eg Baroque) work (and even more in the case of architecture[)].**



*[proportionally, presumably]


**[But see next ts journal entry]



[continued]


[PostedBlogger22for23072025]


{Baroque Sculpture [continued (9)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:300][19910508:0903i]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (9)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]


‘The latter half of the [18th] century [ce]* saw the emergence of a much lighter, more theatrical manner** in the works of Agostino Cornacchini and of Pietro Bracci, whose allegorical figure “Ocean” on the Fontana di Trevi by Niccolò Salvi (completed 1762[ce])*** is almost a parody of Bernini's sculpture. Filippo della Valle worked in a classicizing**** style of almost French sensibility, but the majority of Italian sculpture of the mid-18th century [ce]# became increasingly #* picturesque with a strong tendency towards technical virtuosity.’

#**



*64A~1760|G~1776|C1792[ce]

**G~?


***64A~1760


****M~?

#64C1728|M~1744|A~1760[ce]

1760[ce]ff??


#*(my emph[asis])


#** – [From] Encyclopaedia Britannica 27:98-100

[Source text continues from last previous ts entry]



[continued]


[PostedBlogger22072025]


Sunday, 20 July 2025

{Baroque Sculpture [continued (8)]}[8th May 1991]

[Redbook9:300][19910508:0903h]{Baroque Sculpture [continued (8)]}[8th May 1991]


19910508:0903

[continued]


‘A more or less classical* late Baroque style, best exemplified by the heroic works of Camillo Rusconi in Rome, was dominant in central Italy through the middle of the 18th century.** Rusconi's work had considerable influence outside Italy as well.

***



*M~?

**64C1728|M~1744|A~1760[ce]

2048R~1792[ce]


** – [From] Encyclopaedia Britannica 27:98-100

[Source text continues from last previous ts entry]

[Source text continues in next ts entry]



[continued]


[PostedBlogger20for21072025]