[Redbook10:6-7][19910512:1718g]{Neoclassical
and Romantic Art [continued
(7)]}{Neoclassical
Painting}[12th
May
1991]
19910512.1718
[continued]
‘Classical history and
mythology
provided a large, but not entire, part of the subject
matter of Neo-classical works.’
****
‘Neo-classical art was hardly
connected with contemporary politics, except in France, just before
and during the Revolution, when parallels were drawn between the
contemporary struggle for liberty & events in ancient Greece &
Rome.
The parallels undoubtedly
affected the art of David, who himself took part in the Revolution.
His “Oath of the Horatii” (Louvre) was subsequently interpreted
as foretelling revolutionary struggles, and the gestures of
allegiance were re-enacted in 1794[ce] at a Republican demonstration
organised by the artist together with Robespierre (see Plate 19).*
In the case of David's “Lictors
bringing to Brutus the Bodies of His Sons” (1789[ce]: Louvre and
Wadsworth Athenaeum, Hartford, Connecticut), the death sentence
passed on his own sons by Brutus was seen at the time as a noble
example of the state's welfare taking precedence over a father's
natural feelings.’**
****
Contrast: ‘Napoleon's mastery
over his own fate & denial of accepted norms of behaviour
captivated the Romantic generation….’*** (re: Romanticism)
#
*[Not
reproduced in the ms or the ts]
**(Remember [th]at France is the
exception [per
2nd
paragraph above])
***(–
[[Redbook10:12][19910512:1718#]
{Neoclassical and Romantic Art [continued (#)]}[23rd March 1991],]
12↓)
**** –
ibid
[Encyclopaedia
Britannica 25:]
360
# –
ibid
[Encyclopaedia
Britannica 25:]
362
[continued]
[PostedBlogger13for14122025]